Railroad Lawsuit Kidney CancerRail workers are exposed to carcinogens. Exposure to diesel fuel creosote, creosote and benzene among other toxic substances has contributed to cancer and other chronic diseases such as leukemia, lung cancer mesothelioma and bladder cancer as well as kidney cancer.Contact a lawyer who specializes in railroad cancer now for a no-cost initial consultation if you or someone close to you has been diagnosed with an illness which is connected to your work on a railway.Exposure to CarcinogensEvery day railroad workers are exposed to carcinogens. These include diesel exhaust, asbestos and benzene. Railroad cancer lawsuits against a variety of railroad companies have been filed in large amounts. The lawsuits were filed under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA) which was passed in 1908.Plaintiffs who develop cancer due to on-the-job exposure may be qualified for compensation. An experienced railroad injury lawyer will examine a victim's claim to determine whether there is a viable FELA lawsuit against the company that caused the illness.Railroad workers may be entitled to compensation for medical expenses, lost wages as well as other damages caused by their illness. A lawyer can assist clients in filing a lawsuit before the three year statute outlined by FELA.Plaintiff James Brown alleges that he was diagnosed with leukemia as a result of years of working on trains with unprotected exposure to chemicals like creosote as well as degreasing solvents. He worked on tanks brake shoes, cabooses, and tank cars. He claims to have walked across railroad ties that smelled like creosote. He also saw plaques with skulls and crosses on train cars, which indicated toxic substances. He also claims to have been exposed to diesel fumes when working on locomotive engines and when he stopped in tunnels. The toxins caused headaches and caused breathing difficulties.Inability to provide a Safe Work EnvironmentDespite the fact that work in railroads has always presented a significant risk, modern research has revealed that a number of the occupational hazards that are common in railways are directly linked to cancer and other serious illnesses. Federal law requires railroad employers to provide their workers with adequate protection and guidance to ensure their safety. If  Leukemia lawsuit  do not follow the law with this requirement, they could be held accountable for severe injuries resulting in death or financial ruin.You should seek advice from a seasoned lawyer If you were a railroad employee or if you have a loved-one who was. A lawyer can help you determine if there is a legal claim that is in light of your exposure to dangerous carcinogens. There is a three-year statute of limitations, therefore it is essential to contact an attorney immediately.Railroad workers are exposed toxic chemicals like creosote as well as diesel fumes and exhaust. These toxic fumes are often the causes of cancer, such as mesothelioma and other lung diseases. If  Leukemia lawsuit 've developed one of these diseases it is imperative to consult a knowledgeable railroad injury lawyer as soon as possible.The plaintiff worked for the ICRC as a carman/mechanic between September 1975 to December 2015. He claims that his work in the ICRC led to his development of renal (and later adrenal) cancer. He claims that he was constantly exposed to the hazardous chemical, carbon tetrachloride.  Bladder cancer lawsuit  is used by railroads to clean their tracks and brake systems.NegligenceA lawsuit involving railroads can be filed under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (FELA), allowing railroad employees to directly lodge complaints against their employers. To be qualified for damages, a worker must demonstrate that the railroad company was negligent in causing his or her injury or illness.Plaintiff Greger was exposed during his work on the railroad, to numerous toxic chemicals and environmental conditions. Carbon tetrachloride was used to clean brake and rail systems. He claims that his company was unable to warn him about the risks of the chemical that has been linked to cancer.He also walked over rail ties coated in creosote, which he claims was considered to be harmful. He also inhaled diesel fumes from the cabs of locomotives and testified that he suffered from headaches and difficulty breathing. He was also exposed to diesel exhaust when he stopped in tunnels on running locomotives and claims that this caused him to feel sick.He claims he questioned his doctors about the link between his work on the railway and kidney cancer however they failed to give any information on this connection. He asserts that this was a case of negligence and that the railway should be aware of the link between these exposures and kidney cancer. He seeks compensation for medical expenses along with pain and suffering as well as the loss of earnings.DamagesThe damages in a kidney   cancer lawsuit   filed by a railroad are the result of a combination of medical expenses along with lost wages and other expenses. The amount of these damages could differ greatly based on the particular situation. An experienced attorney will make sure that you get the maximum amount of compensation for your losses.In one example an older man, 51, was diagnosed with myelodysplastic disorder (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in 2008. He was employed as an employee of maintenance of way for Chicago & North Western Railway and its successor Union Pacific Railroad from 1976 to 2008 as a machine operator. He was exposed to chemicals containing benzene, including creosote, and degreasing agents.Railroad companies are legally bound by a obligation to follow government safety regulations for workplaces. These includes protecting workers from exposure to known carcinogens. If a railroad does not comply to do so, the consequences can be devastating for the families of the victims.Hughes Law Offices has represented thousands injured people and railroad workers exposed to toxic fumes. Contact us today for a free consultation from an experienced and knowledgeable railroad injury lawyer. The Founder Andrew Hughes actually defended railroads in FELA cases for the majority of his legal career. As such, he is familiar with the laws that govern these claims, as well as the potential dangers that can arise from on-the-job exposure.