Was busy these days, no time..
Ok I'll try to make justice to that reply and remember the points i made..

Thanks for the honest reply. I think that you have great content specially on how you get your results, but it gets overshadowed with some unwarranted criticisms to others... drama.. and you know who likes drama... , like I said before about Tristan when he was obviously joking about ubering with a RollsR. and some other statement he did in his podcast that you showed... no big deal i think, you joke and act silly/crazy, we all do ... I don't think you crazy cause you flip the bird to a guy in a car.. I might not do that but i know it's a joke..  There's some  videos you can see in the island reality tv Tristan was in in his early 20s, he was calm and collected and took leadership and mature for his age... Just saying "he's a bjtch" is a typical black and white generalization that usually women make when they are angry... girls be like: "oh it was all bad", " i never liked you", " you Always do that" "you are the worse" "you never take me out" "you always lazy", and when they're happy they forget that and it's the opposite all of a sudden.. Always extreme and absolutes.. Or what moms usually say to their kids; "your room is ALWAYS a mess", "you dress like a bum", " it's all dirty" "you never do anything"... overblown generalizations doesn't fit men. The problem with Tates is there's too much content to prove you wrong where they act manly and speak calm and collected, equilibrated. 

Using your logic, how would you shame George (yourself) if you were someone else... you'd point out these same inconsistencies, pick on random isolated instances and inflate them as if it was the norm... "George is full of himself", "he generalizes like women do, either all or nothing", "he screams to people from his car calling them gay and picks up fights like a teenager" "he's emotional and throws computers", " he keeps complimenting himself, maybe cause nobody else does", "he's always saying; they are bjtches...UNLIKE ME, they are weak... unlike real men.. like me", " they don't know unlike me", "i've already spoken shit about all the gurus in the manosphere, I guess I'm the new top dog in town..." ... let the content speak for itself, it's needless to say "unlike me" all the time, if you are pointing out criticisms, it goes without saying that you aren't like that...   You've say it yourself, "less is more", people will get it. 
In those instances it feels like you do it just cause want to "put yourself in the map of the community" (there's btw 100 other guys with over 100k followwrs that done this for years but less hype around them) and falling into your own hype (with your raising subscriptions and views by good content) that you want to rush the process and pick on everyone just to be "the one"... that's where pride and ego come in. Most of your viewers might not see it this way and just follow blindly, and when that happens, you'll have some type of responsibility, since after all, what you want is to help men... When you get bigger, the haters or "the new influencers" will pick on those stuff and hyperinflate them just to diss you and get clout just the same...

Making a video about Andrew T being a psycho also felt right away like a reason to get clout, being "the man in the community that dissed tate" (btw Jon Zherka also has dissed Tate)... Because half the world hates him, (feminists liberals) and they will automatically like a video hatin on Tate... not because they like you but because they hate him.. It's like getting a hug from a girl you like just cause the guy she likes is watching, but not cause she likes you..  
Also many who follow Tate will think: "Tate helped me get in shape, helped stop drinking and doing drugs, helped me gain confidence, out of depression, helped me live a healthy life and work hard, do fasting, being consistent, hustle... This George guy is full of shjt and wants clout.." Sure you'll get more views... and that's how many will see it, as if you do it for the views... 

Why not instead make a video in general about psychology and psychopathy from an objective lens, not a subjective lens as now... And then you can add examples of different people in some points where they seem crazy, what's not psycho and why it seems so but isn't... Calling him a psychopath is a stretch, i don't think he has bad intentions (psychos do) sure he has a big ego but most have and that's another story... many people throw big words without considering the repercussions and meaning of it.  I don't believe in the shjt liberal media says and sues him about... If that were true, all politicians would be in jail you know.
I also respect he spoke openly about not getting vaxxed and rather fly private cause at that level people don't need any of that which other people must follow... 
Sure he pimped some ho3s, but you talk about manipulation yourself... sure it's "good manipulation" but people can cut your clips and just put those 5 seconds and say that's you are all about manipulating badly... Also, now girls pimp themselves in onlfans and some even create agencies to "manage" others girls.. same same as Tate essentially... Switch the word "pimp" to "manage" and people will be manipulated into liking it... Words are important.. (it's my specialty, lol btw you keep talking about your accent, i can help you with it, I have experience with that)  
Just like girls change the word "cheating" so they feel better... some say "it was an escapade", "it was a healing process", "it was a sin", "i wasn't myself"... just to not say "cheat".. and that little change of vernacular makes them psychologically and emotionally feel better... words.
Also, yes, Tate has tons of cars he doesn't need... that's called "fk u money", joe rogan does too, jay leno, Mayweather too, rich people collect expensive shjt i also eat more buffets and restaurants than i need and than before, cause before i couldn't afford it... he's just at another scale. But Tate also has been doing charity for years... like really feeding people, not BilGates type charity poisoning people. Gates is a psycho, but he doesn't look like one imo. So is your video going to be insightful about psychology and how to identify a psycho in life with all kinds of examples, or about one individual? What about how to know someone isn't one when he looks like one and how people easily misinterpret shjt and fall for scams and manipulations.
Remember people in comments just hate without analyzing and many will cheer and agree just cause someone they hate is getting slandered.
Also people hate Tate for selling online, but so does Amazon, everyone in Udemy, in Teachable, in Clickfunnels, WarriorForum... he just was great a marketing it... Some say the content is good some say it's bad... idk...seems to be up to each..

So calling him a psycho is a stretch, they aren't a danger to society (psychos are) like tv claims but he's just an opportunist.. and maybe have a different Philosophy than you... So does Jon Zherka... heard him last weak, and I agree with many things, but not all...Sure he's crazy but aren't we all.... and i won't dismiss the good things just cause there's bad things (like women do)

Saying he's a psycho because of his eyes reminds me of an old Soviet Video of a lecture (link below) where they bring a student in and let them see a picture of a man and the professor introducing the old man in the photo as being a dangerous criminal and the students should make a psychological analytical portrait of him... And sure enough they described all traits of a psychopath... 
Later the professor invited new students in to describe the same man in the picture but this time, the lecturer introduced him as a scholar and good man poet etc... Sure enough, this time the students described his eyes and face as what they perceived to be a good angelical man.... that should leave room for thought.. Starts in minute 11:12
https://youtu.be/I-xdZuKt8i4?t=672  In other words people can easily misjudge based on the preconceived notions and ideas given prior to making their assessment.


About Myron, Yeah one can talk fast with hysteria and slow and nervous which might have the same core root. Myron only has a limited time to speak and he's gotten better with time and experience at articulating his points in a quickly, it's a skill and he does a great job, he's not Kevin Samuels, but he's schooling those ho3s.. Which he coulnd't do by keeping quiet "cause that'll teach them".
Women won't just learn by giving them silence... With silence they'll react in a way, but they won't cognitively learn the why, which he does help describing a picture with good analogies. Also if you just hear 1 minute clip without the context and factors of what he's responding to, you won't realize the patience he must have to explain the simplest concepts to them jdiots over and over until they get it. Yes he kicks people from his show... But he's just boundaries... and sure maybe there's other way, but his work.. and they are successful in the numbers.
He must have a lot of patience to listen to those stoopid girls to keep doing that for hours and episode after episode for years already. Must be aggravating to be honest.

Same thing with Jordan Peterson in the video explaining to liberals, maybe the punks didn't get it at the moment, but that video is a classic now for a reason, and in retrospective, many people learned he's right and when those liberals come to their senses they'll be a testament for others on how foolish they could be. All those people got convinced to be leftists by people who didn't stop telling them that BS into their ears until they finally got brainwashed...  maybe it takes the same to stop it and reverse it... Also most of the time people will never accept they're wrong in the heat of the moment.... but a good argument is a seed for new way of thinking to grow. What liberals really deserved is being punched in the face and beat up.... But isn't that also an emotional action?.. Sometimes no matter what you do, it won't be right, "damn if you do and damn if you don't"... but drastic situations maybe take drastic actions, that maybe bring the needed result.


when it comes to women i agree many are like children in some aspects, that's something i agree with sinsce before.... But you take away all their responsibility and accountability... It's like you are alluding they shouldn't be responsible. There's good educated children and bad one's.... But then you contradict yourself saying we should settle for 6 or 7s cause they are better partners (which could be true), but that would mean that 6s and 7s are accountable?
Jhonny Depp sure let his guard down and for that deserved getting "checked"... But i don't agree defending a woman shjtting his bed... A good woman would break up with him, create a scene but there's levels to things... That's why we should learn to assess and read the women in time before getting into relationships... as you also said... but Why? cause good women wouldn't do that shjt. 
So if shjtting it's acceptable, then there's no limits to what else they can do for a mans mistake ...what's next? throwing shjt to him? filming secretly in the toilet and show it to the world? physically hurt his family? Would you still defend them and say it's ok cause Jhonny made a mistake? ...then there's no limits, if you say they aren't accountable like children.
Sure today's women are the results of men as well, but men also are the result of mostly feminism's social engineering. But a woman well raised, which there are plenty of, would never do that to even the biggest simp...she'd leave him on time or not be with him at all.
Men needing to man-up doesn't dismiss the fact that women should "lady-up".

btw thanks for suggesting максим вердикт, just today came across the chanel Dan Bacon, what you think of him, and Tod V?
What about talking about what you agree with? from famous or unfamous people like the guy who taught you... Or historical figures, movies... 
I have this theory that everything is a language, in other words you can translate from poker to getting women just like we translate from english to Spanish... Maybe you can make videos comparing opening your business to getting women, traveling / martial arts / football / art / gastronomy etc - to getting women...  I haven't seen many do that covering different topics vs that.
Anyways, thanks for reading and replying the messages and the good info.
Wrote a lot but covered different things, forgot some things, but hope it made sense overall